Penguatan Kesiapan Pedagogik Dosen Melalui Microteaching Terintegrasi Artificial Intelligence

Junaidi Junaidi; Zain Arfin Utama; Erna Setyaningsih; Mariza Mustika Dewi; Rif'atul Himmah

doi:10.55537/gabdimas.v4i2.1934

Penulis

Junaidi Junaidi Universitas Agung Putra
Zain Arfin Utama Universitas Agung Putra
Erna Setyaningsih Universitas Agung Putra
Mariza Mustika Dewi Universitas Agung Putra
Rif'atul Himmah Universitas Agung Putra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55537/gabdimas.v4i2.1934

Kata Kunci:

Microteaching, artificial intelligence, Pedagogik Dosen

Abstrak

Perkembangan artificial intelligence (AI), khususnya generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), membuka peluang bagi dosen untuk mengembangkan perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan refleksi pembelajaran. Namun, penggunaan AI memerlukan kesiapan pedagogik agar keluaran teknologi tidak diterima secara otomatis dan tetap berada dalam kendali profesional dosen. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan memperkuat kesiapan dosen dalam merancang dan mempraktikkan pembelajaran berbantuan AI melalui microteaching. Kegiatan dilaksanakan pada 12 September 2026 di Universitas Agung Putra Semarang dengan sasaran 30 dosen. Tahapan kegiatan meliputi asesmen kebutuhan, penyampaian materi, demonstrasi, praktik penggunaan AI, penyusunan rancangan pembelajaran, microteaching, umpan balik, dan evaluasi. Evaluasi menggunakan tiga instrumen pre-test–post-test, yaitu tes pengetahuan, skala self-efficacy, dan rubrik penerapan melalui microteaching; partisipasi diukur terpisah melalui observasi proses. Pada data empiris kegiatan, rata-rata pengetahuan meningkat dari 60% menjadi 85%, self-efficacy dari 65% menjadi 80%, dan skor penerapan microteaching dari 65% menjadi 85%. Partisipasi proses mencapai 85%. Capaian pelaksanaan microteaching sebesar 80% pada tahap praktik merupakan indikator proses, sedangkan angka 85% merupakan rerata skor penerapan berdasarkan rubrik evaluasi pasca-kegiatan. Hasil ini menunjukkan adanya peningkatan capaian pada konstruk yang diukur, tetapi tidak dimaknai sebagai bukti peningkatan kompetensi pedagogik secara menyeluruh. Program lebih tepat diposisikan sebagai intervensi awal yang menghubungkan literasi AI, perencanaan pembelajaran, praktik microteaching, verifikasi keluaran AI, dan refleksi.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Astuti, M., Kanada, R., Suryana, I., Miranti, M., Andini, A., Jannah, M., & Sadina, B. (2024). Microteaching sebagai pusat sumber belajar di era digital. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(3), 2430–2437. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v8i3.7806

Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, 102411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102411

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating? Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2025). Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers & Education, 227, 105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224

Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Helmiati. (2014). Micro teaching: Melatih keterampilan dasar mengajar. Aswaja Pressindo.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Jin, Y., & Sercu, L. (2025). ChatGPT interventions in higher education: A systematic review of experimental studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(4), e70072. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70072

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, F., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.

Lintner, T. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy scales. npj Science of Learning, 9, 50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00264-4

Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Rahman, E. F., Junaeti, E., & Piantari, E. (2024). Pelatihan microteaching untuk mengoptimalkan keterampilan mengajar guru di Kabupaten Purwakarta. Minda Baharu, 8(2), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.33373/jmb.v8i2.6699

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Sperling, K., Stenberg, C.-J., McGrath, C., Åkerfeldt, A., Heintz, F., & Stenliden, L. (2024). In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.

Widyawati, W., & Sukadari, S. (2023). Pemanfaatan media pembelajaran berbasis teknologi sebagai alat pembelajaran kekinian bagi guru profesional IPS dalam penerapan pendidikan karakter menyongsong era Society 5.0. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 10, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v10i.667

Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., Román-González, M., & Noor, N. M. (2024). Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review. Review of Education, 12(2), e3489. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3489

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0