The Role of Libraries in Strengthening Information Literacy toward Filter Bubble and Echo Chamber in Algorithm-Based Digital Information Consumption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55537/j-ibm.v6i1.1711Keywords:
information literacy, library, filter bubble, echo chamber, digital information consumptionAbstract
Digital technology has changed how people access information, especially through the internet, social media, and search engines. However, algorithmic personalization may limit information diversity and create filter bubbles and echo chambers. This study analyzes the role of libraries in raising public awareness of these phenomena in digital information consumption. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the research was conducted at the Medan City Library and Archives Office with nine informants consisting of librarians and library users selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and documentation, then analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings show that users rely on digital media because it is fast and accessible, but this also increases the risk of homogeneous information exposure and weak information verification. Libraries support information literacy through credible sources, reference services, literacy programs, digital literacy seminars, digital library training, and anti-hoax education. This study concludes that libraries can help communities become more critical and selective in consuming algorithm-based digital information.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. CV Literasi Nusantara.
Ahmmad, M., Shahzad, K., Iqbal, A., & Latif, M. (2025). Trap of social media algorithms: A systematic review of research on filter bubbles, echo chambers, and their impact on youth. Societies, 15(11), Article 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110301
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (2024, February 7). APJII jumlah pengguna internet Indonesia tembus 221 juta orang. APJII. https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang
Bozdag, E., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Breaking the filter bubble: Democracy and design. Ethics and Information Technology, 17, 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9380-y
Case, D. O., & Given, L. M. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (4th ed.). Emerald Group Publishing.
Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), Article e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2024). IFLA trend report update 2023: Realising libraries’ potential as partners for development. IFLA.
Nematzadeh, A., Ciampaglia, G. L., Ahn, Y.-Y., & Flammini, A. (2019). Information overload in group communication: From conversation to cacophony in the Twitch chat. Royal Society Open Science, 6(10), 191412. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191412
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Nguyen, T. T., Hui, P.-M., Harper, F. M., Terveen, L., & Konstan, J. A. (2014). Exploring the filter bubble: The effect of using recommender systems on content diversity. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 677–686). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2566486.2568012
Nikolov, D., Lalmas, M., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2019). Quantifying biases in online information exposure. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(3), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24121
Ningsih, L. S., & Sayekti, R. (2023). Peran perpustakaan dalam meningkatkan literasi informasi di kalangan masyarakat: Sebuah systematic literature review. Pustaka Karya: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 11(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.18592/pk.v11i2.10104
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
Sanches, T., Lopes, C., & Antunes, M. L. (2024). Public libraries fighting disinformation: An analysis of knowledge, resources, and actions of Portuguese librarians. In S. Kurbanoğlu et al. (Eds.), Information Experience and Information Literacy (pp. 150–160). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52998-6_13
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif: Untuk penelitian yang bersifat eksploratif, enterpretif, interaktif dan konstruktif. Alfabeta.
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884711
Trixa, J., & Kaspar, K. (2024). Information literacy in the digital age: Information sources, evaluation strategies, and perceived teaching competences of pre-service teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1336436. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1336436
UNESCO. (2021). Media and information literate citizens: Think critically, click wisely! UNESCO.
Vintilă, D. (2024). Public libraries: Key actors in fighting misinformation in the future digital society. Culture. Society. Economy. Politics, 4(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.2478/csep-2024-0003
Vraga, E. K., Tully, M., & Bode, L. (2022). Assessing the relative merits of news literacy and corrections in responding to misinformation on Twitter. New Media & Society, 24(10), 2354–2371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821998691
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe.
We Are Social, & Meltwater. (2024). Digital 2024: Indonesia. DataReportal.
Wulandari, V., Rullyana, G., & Ardiansah, A. (2021). Pengaruh algoritma filter bubble dan echo chamber terhadap perilaku penggunaan internet. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 17(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v17i1.423
Yusuf, A. M. (2014). Metode penelitian: Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan penelitian gabungan. Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Young, J. C., Boyd, B., Yefimova, K., Wedlake, S., Coward, C., & Hapel, R. (2021). The role of libraries in misinformation programming: A research agenda. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 53(4), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000620966650
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Astrid Ola Zuleika, Retno Sayekti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.