Intercultural Communication of the National Integration Forum in Maintaining Local Harmony

Muhammad Nazar Luthfi Tambunan; Rubino Rubino; Farhan Indra; Ahmad Sujai Tanjung

doi:10.55537/j-ibm.v6i1.1755

Authors

Muhammad Nazar Luthfi Tambunan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Rubino Rubino Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Farhan Indra Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Ahmad Sujai Tanjung Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55537/j-ibm.v6i1.1755

Keywords:

Intercultural Communication, Harmony, Local Wisdom, North Tapanuli, Intercultural communication, forum pembauran kebangsaan

Abstract

This study examines the intercultural communication strategies used by the Forum Pembauran Kebangsaan of North Tapanuli Regency in maintaining local-wisdom-based harmony. North Tapanuli is a multicultural region shaped by ethnic, religious, and cultural diversity, making intercultural communication important for sustaining social cohesion. This study used a qualitative phenomenological approach involving twelve informants selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and documentation, and were analyzed thematically. The findings indicate two main strategies. First, the Forum Pembauran Kebangsaan internalizes local cultural values, such as Dalihan Na Tolu, ojo adigang adigung adiguna, and dima bumi dipijak disinan langik dijunjuang, as shared ethical references in cross-cultural relations. Second, the forum applies inclusive and adaptive dialogue by involving community, religious, traditional, and government actors. Supporting factors include shared local values, stakeholder involvement, and government support, while obstacles include hoaxes, sensitive ethnicity-religion issues, limited funding, and low youth participation. Practically, the study suggests that local wisdom can serve as a communication basis for strengthening dialogue, preventing social misunderstanding, and guiding more participatory harmony programs in multicultural communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agung, D. A. G., Nasih, A. M., Sumarmi, Idris, & Kurniawan, B. (2024). Local wisdom as a model of interfaith communication in creating religious harmony in Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100827

Aini, S., & Akmal, A. (2022). Local wisdom of Batak culture in supporting the tolerance character of the Tapanuli society. MUHARRIK: Jurnal Dakwah dan Sosial, 5(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.37680/muharrik.v5i1.853

Astraguna, I. W., Gunada, I. W. A., Yasa, I. K. W. P., & Chandra, E. (2024). Intercultural communication aesthetics in multicultural reality in maintaining social harmony. In Proceedings of the 5th Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Science 2023 (pp. 208–216). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-273-6_25

BPS Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara. (2025). Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara dalam angka 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara.

Dine, C. B. (2021). Intercultural living together, the integration and recognition of self and other. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v21i3.21

Hamid, A., Ritonga, S., & Nst, A. M. (2024). Kearifan lokal Dalihan Na Tolu sebagai pilar toleransi beragama pada masyarakat Tapanuli Selatan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 13(1), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v13i1.74809

Hart, T. (2017). Speech codes theory. In The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication (pp. 1–13). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0123

Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 34 Tahun 2006 tentang Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Pembauran Kebangsaan di Daerah.

Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2021). Fostering dialogic engagement. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984462

Moustakas, L. (2023). Social cohesion: Definitions, causes and consequences. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030075

Musyrafah, L., Herlan, & Musa, D. T. (2026). Analysis efforts of the Forum Pembauran Kebangsaan (FPK) in preventing community conflicts in West Kalimantan. Jurnal Ilmiah WUNY, 8(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.21831/jwuny.v8i1.91045

Paramita, S., & Sari, W. P. (2016). Intercultural communication to preserve harmony between religious group in Jaton Village Minahasa. Jurnal Pekommas, 1(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2016.2010205

Pemerintah Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara. (2024). Profil Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara.

Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

Philipsen, G., & Hart, T. (2015). Speech codes theory. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi178

Rahman, A., Wasino, Suyahmo, Arsal, T., & Shintasiwi, F. A. (2022). Local wisdom and strengthening social integration in multiethnic society post-Aceh conflict. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.3.06

Siregar, I. J. K., Juita, J., Hafidza, N., Khadijah, S., Musa, T. S., & Irwansyah, R. (2025). Peran strategis Forum Pembauran Kebangsaan (FPK) dalam memperkuat persatuan dan kesatuan masyarakat di Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 9(1), 8984–8989. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v9i1.26015

Ting-Toomey, S. (2017). Facework and face negotiation theory. In The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication (pp. 1–5). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0105

Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00004-2

Weda, S., Rahman, F., Samad, I. A., Gunawan, F., & Fitriani, S. S. (2022). How millennials can promote social harmony through intercultural communication at higher education. Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 3(1), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.47175/rissj.v3i1.398