Diagnosing a Perceived Democratic Paradox in Student Elections: An Islamic Political Ethics Perspective

Lia Agita Sari; Elly Warnisyah Harahap

doi:10.55537/j-ibm.v6i1.1808

Authors

Lia Agita Sari Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Elly Warnisyah Harahap Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55537/j-ibm.v6i1.1808

Keywords:

democratic paradox, student elections, student organizations, Islamic political ethics, qualitative case study

Abstract

Student elections may follow formal procedures while substantive competition is perceived as being shaped by organizational affiliation, senior networks, and unequal opportunities for deliberation. This qualitative single-case study examines this tension at the Faculty of Ushuluddin and Islamic Studies, UIN Sumatera Utara, through the Islamic political-ethical principles of musyawarah, al-'adl, amanah, and ukhuwah. Data were collected on 18–20 May 2026 through semi-structured interviews with six informants, observations of SEMAF and DEMAF election processes, and reviews of relevant organizational and electoral documents. Thematic analysis identified three patterns: affiliation networks were perceived to influence organizational choices and electoral support; limited cross-group communication was associated with personalized tension; and participants expected more transparent, equal, and accountable procedures. The findings do not establish electoral invalidity, coercion, preferential treatment, or abuse of power. Islamic political ethics is therefore used as an interpretive framework for a proposed governance pilot rather than as an intervention whose effectiveness has been tested. The study offers a context-specific diagnostic and practical agenda involving transparent rules, equal access to candidate forums, conflict-of-interest disclosure, neutral grievance mechanisms, and cross-group dialogue with measurable process indicators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardianto, H. T. (2021). Aktivis dakwah di tengah percaturan politik kampus: Dinamika gerakan keislaman di Universitas Diponegoro. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 6(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v6i1.10075

Bogaards, M. (2018). Deliberative democracy and electoral reform in South Africa: A campus experiment. Politikon, 45(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2017.1354549

Fatahillah, A., Zuhdi, M. L., & Mukhtar, S. (2022). Pencegahan radikalisme keagamaan di pemuda Indonesia: Studi kasus organisasi mahasiswa Islam (HMI, PMII, IMM, KAMMI) periode pengurus 2017–2021. Journal of Terrorism Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/jts.v4i2.1051

Griffin, M., King, D., & Reedy, P. (2022). Learning to live the paradox in a democratic organization: A deliberative approach to paradox mindsets. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 21(4), 624–647. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0238

Harahap, E. W., Dalimunthe, N., & Surianto, A. P. (2024). Identity politics in Islamic views. Al-Afkar, Journal for Islamic Studies, 7(1), 1001–1010. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i1.934

Junaidi, J., Abdul Majid, L., & Nazri, M. A. (2023). Revisiting social justice: Exploring the Qur’anic paradigm in addressing contemporary challenges. Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam, 25(2), 153–192. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol25no2.5

Karnaini, Z. (2021). Concepts and application of good governance in the government of Omar bin Abdul Aziz. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah, 6(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v6i1.108

Kennedy, J., & Pek, S. (2023). Mini-publics, student participation, and universities’ deliberative capacity. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2111551

Mas’amah, M., Leuape, E. S., Nafie, J. A., Jelahut, F. E., & Nggaba, S. N. (2023). Political communication practice of Cipayung student organization Kupang–NTT Province. Komunikator, 15(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.16647

Matthews, K. E., & Dollinger, M. (2023). Student voice in higher education: The importance of distinguishing student representation and student partnership. Higher Education, 85(3), 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00851-7

Pratama, I. A. (2020). Pendidikan politik di perguruan tinggi: Sebuah konsepsi. Sustainable: Jurnal Kajian Mutu Pendidikan, 3(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.32923/kjmp.v3i1.1300

Putra, T. P., Widiansyah, S., & Hardiansyah, M. A. (2024). Modal sosial pemimpin organisasi mahasiswa dalam memenangkan pemilihan raya mahasiswa di FKIP Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa tahun 2022. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Undiksha, 6(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpsu.v6i1.96081

Rahmatiah, R., Suhendra Arbani, T., Rais Asmar, A., Umar, K., Chaerul Risal, M., & Fajri, M. (2022). The significance and integration of religious moderation in student organizations on religious campuses. KnE Social Sciences, 2022, 549–559. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i8.10773

Shah, P. P., Peterson, R. S., Jones, S. L., & Ferguson, A. J. (2021). Things are not always what they seem: The origins and evolution of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(2), 426–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220965186

Suhada, K., Sabrina, Zalika, A., Fitriani, R., Nuriski, N. A., Naufal, M. F., Taqwa, R., Sari, K. A., & Ilham, I. (2026). Narasi superioritas dalam kontestasi mahasiswa. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(3), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i3.5125

Wulandari, A. P. A., & Harahap, A. M. (2025). The role of female activists in enhancing inter-member organizational performance: A case study of the PMII organization at UIN Sumatera Utara. Journal La Sociale, 6(5), 1377–1392. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i5.2302