Implementation of TOPSIS Method in Determining UKK and UKM Interests Among Students at UIN Bukittinggi

Jamaluddin Effendi Furqon; Firdaus Annas; Yulifda Elin Yuspita; Gusnita Darmawati

doi:10.55537/cosie.v5i2.1644

Authors

Jamaluddin Effendi Furqon Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek
Firdaus Annas Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek
Yulifda Elin Yuspita Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek
Gusnita Darmawati Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55537/cosie.v5i2.1644

Keywords:

Minat, UKK, UKM, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, TOPSIS, Decision Support System

Abstract

This study is motivated by the declining level of student interest in UKM and UKK organizations on campus over the years. One of the main issues is that many students feel mismatched with the UKK/UKM they selected after joining. Therefore, a decision support system is proposed to address this problem. The objective of this research is to analyze the implementation of a Decision Support System (DSS) using the TOPSIS method in determining students’ preferences for UKK/UKM at UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi. This study applies an applied research approach with TOPSIS as the data analysis method. The evaluation includes accuracy testing between manual calculations and system results, as well as sensitivity testing using the SAW method. The results show that the TOPSIS-based DSS utilizes eight benefit criteria: interest, talent, UKK/UKM description, activity division, activity schedule, recruitment system, membership requirements, and flagship programs. The alternatives include all UKK/UKM at UIN SMDD Bukittinggi. The accuracy test produced a score of 73.23% from 1,188 student data samples, indicating that the system is feasible. Furthermore, the sensitivity test shows a comparison value of 0.13% for SAW and 15.58% for TOPSIS, indicating that TOPSIS is more relevant for this case.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. M. Sari, M. Kamila, and L. Yarni, “Bakat dan Minat,” J. Multidisiplin Ilmu, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 227–238, 2023, doi: 10.31004/koloni.v2i4.569.

[2] A. Putri, D. Arisandi, and T. Sutrisno, “Sistem Informasi Unit Kegiatan Mahasiswa (Ukm) Universitas Tarumanagara Berbasis Web,” J. Ilmu Komput. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 1, p. 11, 2023, doi: 10.24912/jiksi.v11i1.24154.

[3] M. D. Arief, Y. Anis, and A. Saputra, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Bantuan Sosial Menggunakan Metode Topsis ( Studi Kasus SMA Pramula ),” pp. 316–323, 2024.

[4] A. K. Barus, Y. A. Dalimunthe, S. Informasi, and U. H. Medan, “Decision Support System in Determining Private University Ranking,” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 189–197, 2025, doi: 10.69916/jkbti.v4i2.319.

[5] J. Ran, M. Li, J. Rong, D. Zhao, A. Kadir, and Q. Luo, “Evaluation of Adjustment Effects of Highway Guide Signs Based on the TOPSIS Method,” pp. 1–31, 2025, doi: 10.3390/app15094949.

[6] D. Karseno and B. Hendrik, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru,” J. Responsif Ris. Sains dan Inform., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 34–41, 2023, doi: 10.51977/jti.v5i1.1014.

[7] R. D. Gunawan and F. Ariany, “Implementasi Metode SAW Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Plano Kertas,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2023, doi: 10.58602/jaiti.v1i1.23.

[8] C. Rofiah and B. Bungin, “Analisis data kualitatif: Manual data analisis prosedur,” Dev. J. Progr. Stud. Ekon. Pembang., vol. 8, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.25139/dev.v8i1.7319.

[9] D. A. Nugroho, “Aplikasi My Calculate Untuk Perhitungan Metode Technique For Other Reference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (TOPSIS),” Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://eprints.amikom.ac.id/id/eprint/18221

[10] A. M. Khasan, N. Mardiyantoro, and N. Hasanah, “Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Santri Teladan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Di Pondok Pesantren Al-Manshur,” STORAGE – J. Ilm. Tek. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 220–226, 2024, doi: 10.55123/storage.v3i4.4445.

[11] N. HASANAH, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pembelian Sepeda Motor Listrik Menggunakan Metode AHP-TOPSIS,” 2023. doi: 10.38101/jtbg.v1i2.425.

[12] I. Y. Pasa, N. Wachid, A. Prasetya, and R. H. Maharrani, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode SAW , WP , dan TOPSIS Untuk Optimasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Proses Seleksi Beasiswa Lazizmu,” J. INTEK, vol. 6, 2023, doi: 10.37729/intek.v6i1.3147.

[13] S. Informasi, S. Bina, and N. Jaya, “Perbandingan Metode AHP dan TOPSIS pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerimaan Bonus Karyawan,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 52–62, 2023, doi: 10.55382/jurnalpustakaai.v3i1.586.

[14] Z. N. Maghfiroh, H. Arga, D. Rani, and R. I. Sudomo, “Implementasi Metode TOPSIS dalam Pemilihan Minat Unit Kegiatan Mahasiswa ( UKM ) pada Prodi Pendidikan Informatika,” J. Syst. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2023, doi: 10.31331/jsitee.v3i2.3904.

[15] Mahful Assaifani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Jurusan SMK Berdasarkan Minat Siswa Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS,” Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://repository.unugiri.ac.id:8443/id/eprint/7244.