Prompt Engineering as a Digital Literacy Skill: A Conceptual Framework for Effective Human–AI Collaboration

Maryam Hussaini; Mahmud Lawan; Ukasha Abubakar

doi:10.55537/cosie.v5i3.1775

Authors

Maryam Hussaini Mewar International University
Mahmud Lawan Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Ukasha Abubakar UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55537/cosie.v5i3.1775

Keywords:

Prompt Engineering, Digital Literacy, AI Literacy, Human-AI Collaboration, Generative Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools has transformed the way individuals interact with digital technologies across educational, professional, and research contexts. Despite the growing reliance on AI systems, many users lack the competencies required to formulate effective prompts, evaluate AI-generated outputs, and engage in responsible human–AI collaboration. Existing digital literacy frameworks primarily emphasize information access, communication, and technology use, while providing limited attention to prompt engineering as a distinct digital competency. This research introduces the conceptual model, the PIERCE Framework, which places prompt engineering as a crucial digital literacy skill in the era of generative AI. The framework was conceptualized by analyzing the latest literature on digital literacy, AI literacy, human–AI interaction, and prompt engineering. The proposed framework is divided into six interrelated components: Prompt Intent Formulation, Intelligent Prompt Design, Engagement with AI, Response Evaluation, Continuous Refinement, and Ethical Application. Together, these components provide a structured pathway for effective human–AI collaboration. The framework contributes to the growing discourse on AI literacy by offering a comprehensive perspective on the competencies required for productive and responsible AI use. The findings highlight the importance of integrating prompt engineering into future digital literacy initiatives, educational programs, and professional development practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] E. Kasneci et al., "ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education," Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 103, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

[2] Y. K. Dwivedi et al., "So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy," International Journal of Information Management, vol. 71, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.

[3] UNESCO, Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2023.

[4] OpenAI, "GPT-4 technical report," arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023.

[5] T. B. Brown et al., "Language models are few-shot learners," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020.

[6] L. Ouyang et al., "Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 27730–27744, 2022.

[7] J. Wei et al., "Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 24824–24837, 2022.

[8] R. Bommasani et al., "On the opportunities and risks of foundation models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258, 2021.

[9] D. Long and B. Magerko, "What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations," in Proc. CHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020, pp. 1–16.

[10] O. Almatrafi, A. Johri, and H. Lee, "A systematic review of AI literacy conceptualization, constructs, and implementation and assessment efforts," Computers and Education Open, vol. 6, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100173.

[11] N. Knoth, A. Tolzin, A. Janson, and J. M. Leimeister, "AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225.

[12] C. Zhang and B. Magerko, "Generative AI literacy: A comprehensive framework for literacy and responsible use," arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19038, 2025.

[13] M. J. Koch et al., "Meta AI literacy scale: Further validation and development of a scale for measuring AI literacy," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2024.

[14] R. Vuorikari, S. Kluzer, and Y. Punie, DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2022.

[15] D. Lee and E. Palmer, "Prompt engineering in higher education: A systematic review to help inform curricula," International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 7, 2025.

[16] P. Liu et al., "Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 1–35, 2023.

[17] A. Bozkurt and R. C. Sharma, "Generative AI and prompt engineering: The art of whispering to let the genie out of the algorithmic world," Asian Journal of Distance Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. i–vii, 2023.

[18] W. Cain, "Prompting change: Exploring prompt engineering in large language model AI and its potential to transform education," TechTrends, 2023.

[19] P. Korzynski, G. Mazurek, P. Krzypkowska, and A. Kurasinski, "Artificial intelligence prompt engineering as a new digital competence: Analysis of generative AI technologies such as ChatGPT," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 25–37, 2023.

[20] L. S. Lo, "The CLEAR path: A framework for enhancing information literacy through prompt engineering," The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 49, no. 4, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102720.

[21] B. Meskó, "Prompt engineering as an important emerging skill for medical professionals: Tutorial," Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 25, 2023.

[22] A. Barrett and A. Pack, "Not quite eye to A.I.: Student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process," International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 59, 2023.

[23] A. Tlili et al., "What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education," Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, 2023. doi:10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x.

[24] J. Rudolph, S. Tan, and S. Tan, "ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?" Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 342–363, 2023. doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9.

[25] D. Cotton, P. Cotton, and J. Shipway, "Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT," Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 228–239, 2024.

[26] O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond, and F. Gouverneur, "Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education," International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 39, 2019.

[27] B. Memarian and T. Doleck, "Teaching and learning artificial intelligence: Insights from the literature," Education and Information Technologies, 2024.

[28] A. Laupichler, A. Aster, N. Schirch, and T. Raupach, "Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, 2022.

[29] D. T. K. Ng, J. K. L. Leung, S. K. W. Chu, and M. S. Qiao, "Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, 2021.

[30] A. Schepman and P. Rodway, "Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale," Computers in Human Behavior Reports, vol. 1, 2020.

[31] B. Kitchenham and S. Charters, "Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering," Keele University and Durham University, Technical Report EBSE-2007-01, 2007.

[32] H. Snyder, "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, vol. 104, pp. 333–339, 2019.

[33] J. Webster and R. T. Watson, "Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review," MIS Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. xiii–xxiii, 2002.

[34] E. Jaakkola, "Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches," AMS Review, vol. 10, pp. 18–26, 2020.

[35] Y. Xiao and M. Watson, "Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review," Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 93–112, 2019.

[36] G. M. Tawfik et al., "A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data," Tropical Medicine and Health, vol. 47, 2019.

[37] European Commission, "Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence," Official Journal of the European Union, 2024.

[38] L. Floridi and M. Chiriatti, "GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences," Minds and Machines, vol. 30, pp. 681–694, 2020.

[39] E. M. Bender, T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major, and S. Shmitchell, "On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?" in Proc. ACM Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2021, pp. 610–623.

[40] L. Weidinger et al., "Ethical and social risks of harm from language models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.04359, 2021