The Adaptive Medical Image Compression Based On A Hybrid Neural Network With Built-In ROI Detection
Abstract
This study addresses the critical challenge of efficiently compressing the rapidly growing volume of medical images while preserving essential diagnostic details, particularly within the Regions of Interest (ROI). Traditional compression techniques, whether lossless or lossy, often struggle to balance high compression efficiency with image quality lossless methods offer limited data reduction, while lossy techniques risk removing vital clinical information. To overcome these limitations, a comprehensive hybrid compression framework is developed, integrating segmentation and compression within a single deep neural network. The system employs Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to accurately segment medical images and identify ROIs, while an autoencoder-based compression module performs selective encoding applying near-lossless compression for ROI regions to maintain diagnostic fidelity and lossy compression for non-ROI (NROI) areas to maximize storage savings. This unified design eliminates the need for separate processing stages, reduces computational complexity, and enhances compression performance. The proposed framework was validated using the CLEF MED X-ray and BRATS MRI datasets, demonstrating high effectiveness and adaptability across different modalities. Experimental results achieved a Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) of 56.07 dB for ROI and 45.12 dB for NROI, with an overall compression ratio of 6.73, confirming its strong balance between data reduction and image quality.
Downloads
References
[1] X. Dhouib, A. Naït Ali, C. Olivier, and M. S. Naceur, “ROI Based Compression Strategy of 3D MRI Brain Datasets for Wireless Communications,” IRBM, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 163–173, Jun. 2022.
[2] A. Kurmukov, B. Zavolovich, A. Dalechina, V. Proskurov, and B. Shirokikh, “The Effect of Lossy Compression on 3D Medical Images Segmentation with Deep Learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16733, Sep. 2024.
[3] S. Li, J. Lu, Y. Hu, L. S. Mattos, Z. Li, “Towards scalable medical image compression using hybrid model,” Journal of Big Data, vol. 12, art. 45, 2025.
[4] U. P. Srivastava and T. Fujii, “Region of Interest based Medical Image Compression,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02895, Jan. 2022
[5] S. A. Ab Aziz, S. M. Sam, N. H. Hassan et al., “A Performance Review for Hybrid Region of Interest Based Medical Image Compression,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 1–18, Jan. 2023.
[6] Farahani, A. and Mohseni, H., 2021. Medical image segmentation using customized U-Net with adaptive activation functions. Neural Computing and Applications, 33(11), pp.6307-6323.
[7] Y. Liu, R. Tu, L. Sun, Y. Wang, and Z. Liu, “Region Adaptive Transform with Segmentation Prior for Image Compression,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.00628, Mar. 2024.
[8] Q.-D. Pham, H. Nguyen Truong, N. N. Phuong, and K. N. A. Nguyen, “SegTransVAE: Hybrid CNN–Transformer with Regularization for medical image segmentation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08582, Jan. 2022
[9] David, P.F., Kothandapani, S.D. and Pugalendhi, G.K., 2024. Adaptive Compression and Reconstruction for Multidimensional Medical Image Data: A Hybrid Algorithm for Enhanced Image Quality. Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, pp.1-20.
[10] P. V. Bindu, “ROI and Non ROI Image Compression Using Optimal Zero Tree Wavelet and Enhanced Convolutional Neural Network for MRI Images,” SN Computer Science, vol. 4, art. 259, Nov. 2023.
[11] N. E. Bourai, H. F. Merouani, and A. Djebbar, “Deep learning assisted medical image compression: challenges and opportunities—a systematic review,” Neural Computing and Applications, Springer, accepted Mar. 2024.
[12] Shi H, Zhou Z, Qin J, Sun H, Ren Y. A separable privacy-preserving technique based on reversible medical data hiding in plaintext encrypted images using neural network. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2024
[13] G. K. Pugalendhi, “Adaptive compression and reconstruction for multidimensional medical image data: a hybrid algorithm for enhanced image quality,” Journal of Medical Systems, accepted Jan. 2025.
[14] Wu W, Wang Y, Liu Q, Wang G, Zhang J. Wavelet-improved score-based generative model for medical imaging. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 2023 Oct 19;43(3):966-79.
[15] Zhang X, Xiao Y, Wu J, Marshall S, Zhou X. Pharmacometric Model‐Based Sample Size Allocation for a Region of Interest in a Multi‐Regional Phase 2 Trial: A Case Study of an Anti‐Psoriatic Drug. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology. 2025.
[16] Bindu PV, Afthab J. Region of interest based medical image compression using DCT and capsule autoencoder for telemedicine applications. In2021 Fourth International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT) 2021.
[17] Thibeau-Sutre E, Colliot O, Dormont D, Burgos N. Visualization approach to assess the robustness of neural networks for medical image classification. InMedical Imaging 2020: Image Processing 2020.
[18] Menze, B. H., Jakab, A., Bauer, S., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Farahani, K., Kirby, J. Wiest, R. (2014). The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 34(10), 1993-2024.
[19] Aggarwal M, Tiwari AK, Sarathi MP. Comparative analysis of deep learning models on brain tumor segmentation datasets: BraTS 2015-2020 datasets. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle. 2022.
[20] Mehta R, Filos A, Baid U, Sako C, McKinley R, Rebsamen M, Dätwyler K, Meier R, Radojewski P, Murugesan GK, Nalawade S. QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 challenge on quantifying uncertainty in brain tumor segmentation-analysis of ranking scores and benchmarking results. The journal of machine learning for biomedical imaging. 2022.
[21] Baid U, Ghodasara S, Mohan S, Bilello M, Calabrese E, Colak E, Farahani K, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Kitamura FC, Pati S, Prevedello LM. The rsna-asnr-miccai brats 2021 benchmark on brain tumor segmentation and radiogenomic classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02314. 2021.
[22] Zhao XY, Liu GY, Sui YT, Xu M, Tong L. Denoising method for Raman spectra with low signal-to-noise ratio based on feature extraction. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2021.
[23] Jin P, Tang Y, Li D, Wang Y, Ran P, Zhou C, Yuan Y, Zhu W, Liu T, Liang K, Kuang C. Realizing nearly-zero dark current and ultrahigh signal-to-noise ratio perovskite X-ray detector and image array by dark-current-shunting strategy. Nature Communications. 2023.
[24] Hodson TO. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): When to use them or not. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions. 2022.
[25] Yin Y, Shi D, Fairchild AJ. The effect of model size on the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA): The nonnormal case. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2023.
[26] Mohammed IM, Isa NA. Contrast Limited Adaptive Local Histogram Equalization Method for Poor Contrast Image Enhancement. IEEE Access. 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Noor aldeen A.Khalid, aymen hameed, Arkan A.Jassim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



