Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Lifelong Learning: An Empirical Mixed-Methods Study on Educational Equity Human Capital Development

Authors

  • Zohaib Hassan Sain Superior University
  • Anni Rahimah Universitas Brawijaya
  • Nurulannisa Abdullah UITM Cawangan Kelantan
  • Nurhana Fakhriyah Imtinan UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Chanda Chansa Thelma Chreso University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55537/jistr.v5i2.1486

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Data Privacy, Educational Equity, Ethical Challenges, Lifelong Learning

Abstract

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into lifelong learning creates a range of opportunities and challenges, especially for educational equity and human capital development. AI applications in educational environments have the potential to enable personalized learning, expand access, and improve outcomes. Yet, these advantages raise important issues regarding privacy, bias, and human oversight in education. The main aim of this research is to investigate how AI can support educational equality in lifelong learning environments. The research aims to recognise and respond to ethical issues, such as bias, privacy, and implications for autonomy in learning. The study employs a mixed-methods design that includes quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews, and document analysis to assess these concerns. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis are employed for quantitative data, while thematic analysis is conducted for qualitative data to identify major patterns related to ethical considerations. Results demonstrate that AI integration is significantly and positively associated with perceived educational equity (β​=​0.45, p​=​0.001), while Data Privacy Concern (β​=​−0.30, p​=​0.003) and Algorithmic Bias Concern (β​=​−0.25, p​=​0.042) show significant negative moderating effects. Qualitative analysis identifies regulatory need (90%), data privacy (75%), and algorithmic bias (60%) as dominant stakeholder concerns. The study underscores the imperative of robust ethical governance frameworks to ensure AI technologies advance educational equity equitably and sustainably

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] B. B. Gupta, A. Gaurav, V. Arya, W. Alhalabi, D. Alsalman, and P. Vijayakumar, “Enhancing user prompt confidentiality in Large Language Models through advanced differential encryption,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 116, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109215.

[2] Z. Lyu, C. Cheng, H. Lv, and H. Song, “Blockchain Based Intelligent Resource Management in Distributed Digital Twins Cloud,” IEEE Netw., pp. 1–1, 2023, doi: 10.1109/MNET.2023.3326099.

[3] R. Ameri and M. R. Meybodi, “Cognitive blockchain and its application to optimize performance in blockchain systems,” Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol., vol. 35, no. 7, 2024, doi: 10.1002/ett.5009.

[4] A. X. Wang, S. S. Chukova, C. R. Simpson, and B. P. Nguyen, “Data-centric AI to Improve Early Detection of Mental Illness,” in IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing Proceedings, 2023. doi: 10.1109/SSP53291.2023.10207938.

[5] S. Z. Salas-Pilco, K. Xiao, and X. Hu, “Correction to: Artificial Intelligence and Learning Analytics in Teacher Education: A Systematic Review (Education Sciences, (2022), 12, 8, (569), 10.3390/educsci12080569),” 2023. doi: 10.3390/educsci13090897.

[6] M. S. Ummah, “No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における 健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

[7] H. Shaikh, M. S. Khan, Z. A. Mahar, M. Anwar, A. Raza, and A. Shah, “A conceptual framework for determining acceptance of internet of things (IoT) in higher education institutions of Pakistan,” in 2019 International Conference on Information Science and Communication Technology, ICISCT 2019, 2019. doi: 10.1109/CISCT.2019.8777431.

[8] C. Merino-Campos, “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Personalized Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review,” Trends High. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 17, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/higheredu4020017.

[9] J. V. Cubio, MST, “The Influence of Privacy, Bias, and Surveillance Concerns on Teachers’ Willingness to Use Artificial Intelligence in Education,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. IX, no. IIIS, pp. 3192–3208, May 2025, doi: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0240.

[10] Uthman Shehu Lawal and Zohaib Hassan Sain, “Navigating The Obstacles and Complexities of ICT Integration in Pakistan’s Education Sector,” J. Soc. Stud. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 87–99, 2024, doi: 10.61987/jsse.v1i2.350.

[11] Y. Fu and Z. Weng, “Navigating the ethical terrain of AI in education: A systematic review on framing responsible human-centered AI practices,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, p. 100306, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100306.

[12] Q. Feng, “Football mixed teaching design based on ADDIE model under Information Technology : ——Take kicking on the inside of the foot as an example,” in 2021 International Conference on Information Technology and Contemporary Sports (TCS), 2021, pp. 108–112. doi: 10.1109/TCS52929.2021.00031.

[13] Oyebola Olusola Ayeni, Nancy Mohd Al Hamad, Onyebuchi Nneamaka Chisom, Blessing Osawaru, and Ololade Elizabeth Adewusi, “AI in education: A review of personalized learning and educational technology,” GSC Adv. Res. Rev., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 261–271, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0062.

[14] S. He and Y. Li, “Research on Music Classification Technology Based on Integrated Deep Learning Methods,” ICST Trans. Scalable Inf. Syst., 2024, doi: 10.4108/eetsis.4954.

[15] W. Windary and A. H. Hasugian, “Data Mining of Rural Digital Technology Adoption Factors Using Apriori Algorithm,” J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 224–233, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.55537/jistr.v4i3.1324.

[16] M. Sanchez-Pena, X. R. Xu, N. Ramirez, and N. Sambamurthy, “Engineering students and professionals living with a mental illness: An exploration of their experiences and challenges,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2019. doi: 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028416.

[17] C. K. Y. Chan, “A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 38, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3.

[18] H. Nan, Z. Xue, C. Li, M. Zhou, and X. Liu, “P System Design for Integer Factorization,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 15, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13158910.

[19] “Ethical AI for Teaching and Learning,” Cornell Center for Teaching Innovation. [Online]. Available: https://teaching.cornell.edu/generative-artificial-intelligence/ethical-ai-teaching-and-learning?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[20] X. Li and Y. Hu, “AI-driven Culturally Responsive Educational Technology: Based on the Empowerment of Distance Education and the Reconstruction of Inclusive Learning,” in 2025 5th International Conference on Educational Technology (ICET), 2025, pp. 658–661. doi: 10.1109/ICET67421.2025.11380715.

[21] Y. Prawira, L. Hanum, and M. Syaifuddin, “Osase Information System In Web-Based Operation And Device Monitoring At Pt. Telkom Indonesia Arnet Witel Division Medan,” J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 90–97, May 2022, doi: 10.55537/jistr.v1i2.113.

[22] T. Jiang, X. Yuan, Q. Cheng, Y. Shen, L. Wang, and J. Ma, “FairECom: Towards Proof of E-Commerce Fairness Against Price Discrimination,” IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput., pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2023.3334197.

[23] L. Mohammadpour, T. C. Ling, C. S. Liew, and A. Aryanfar, “A Survey of CNN-Based Network Intrusion Detection,” 2022. doi: 10.3390/app12168162.

[24] N. Mangala, B. E. Reddy, and K. R. Venugopal, “Light Weight Circular Error Learning Algorithm (CELA) for Secure Data Communication Protocol in IoT-Cloud Systems,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 845 – 858, 2023, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140792.

[25] M. A. Malek, “Criminal courts’ artificial intelligence: the way it reinforces bias and discrimination,” AI Ethics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 233–245, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s43681-022-00137-9.

[26] X. Chen and J. Fan, “UAV trajectory planning based on APF-RRT∗algorithm with goal-biased strategy,” in Proceedings of the 34th Chinese Control and Decision Conference, CCDC 2022, 2022. doi: 10.1109/CCDC55256.2022.10033554.

[27] Obed Boateng and Bright Boateng, “Algorithmic bias in educational systems: Examining the impact of AI-driven decision making in modern education,” World J. Adv. Res. Rev., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 2012–2017, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.1.0253.

[28] M. Syarif Hartawan, M. D. D. Maharani, and E. Krisnanik Information System, “Structural Model of System Information for Management Innovation Ruminant-Slaughterhouse,” in Proceedings - 2nd International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber, and Information System, ICIMCIS 2020, 2020. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS51567.2020.9354305.

[29] K.-Y. Lam, X. Lu, L. Zhang, X. Wang, H. Wang, and S. Q. Goh, “Efficient FHE-based Privacy-Enhanced Neural Network for Trustworthy AI-as-a-Service,” IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput., pp. 1–18, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2024.3353536.

[30] R. Alizadehsani et al., “Coronary artery disease detection using artificial intelligence techniques: A survey of trends, geographical differences and diagnostic features 1991–2020,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 128, p. 104095, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104095.

[31] H. Zhu, Y. Sun, and J. Yang, “Education : a Systematic Review on Identifying and,” 2025.

[32] B. Memarian and T. Doleck, “Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, p. 100152, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100152.

[33] V. Bolgouras, A. Zarras, C. Leka, I. Stylianou, A. Farao, and C. Xenakis, “Eu regulatory ecosystem for ethical AI,” AI Ethics, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 5063–5080, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s43681-025-00749-x.

[34] G. Puri, N. Socklingam, and D. Herremans, “Digital Lifelong Learning in the Age of AI: Trends and Insights,” 2026, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03114

[35] H. S. A. Kazmi, F. Bukhari, and W. Iqbal, “Acceleration of Digital Education in Pakistan during pandemic (COVID-19): A case study based on ML,” in 2023 2nd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical, Control, and Telecommunication Engineering, ETECTE 2023 - Proceedings, 2023. doi: 10.1109/ETECTE59617.2023.10396662.

[36] M. D. Zakaria, A. A. Aziz, A. A. Jamal, W. A. Mustafa, L. H. Alzubaidi, and A. H. A. Hussein, “Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),” in 3rd IEEE International Conference on Mobile Networks and Wireless Communications, ICMNWC 2023, 2023. doi: 10.1109/ICMNWC60182.2023.10435657.

[37] Pragya Mishara, “The Ethical Implications of AI in Education: Privacy, Bias, and Accountability,” J. Informatics Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.52783/jier.v4i2.1827.

[38] L. S. Soares and L. A. da Silva, “Data Fairness to Find Biases That Influence the Algorithm’s Decision Making Results,” in 3rd European Conference on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, ECIAIR 2021, 2021. doi: 10.34190/EAIR.21.034.

[39] A. Saxena, P. Hinge, S. Yadav, S. M. Jayadeva, M. Lourens, and S. M. Ikharkar, “Bias in AI-Driven Performance Management Systems: Ethical and Practical Considerations,” in 2025 World Skills Conference on Universal Data Analytics and Sciences (WorldSUAS), 2025, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/WorldSUAS66815.2025.11199187.

[40] C. Daniel and C. Pettit, “Charting the past and possible futures of planning support systems: Results of a citation network analysis,” Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci., vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1875–1892, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1177/23998083211072866.

[41] M. Jonsson, C. Gustavsson, J. Gulliksen, and S. Johansson, “How have public healthcare providers in Sweden conformed to the European Union’s Web Accessibility Directive regarding accessibility statements on their websites?,” Univers. Access Inf. Soc., 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10209-023-01063-1.

[42] N. S. A. Megeid, “The impact of climate risk disclosure on financial performance, financial reporting and risk management: evidence from Egypt,” Futur. Bus. J., vol. 10, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s43093-024-00309-5.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Sain, Z. H., Rahimah, A., Abdullah, N., Imtinan, N. F., & Thelma, C. C. (2026). Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Lifelong Learning: An Empirical Mixed-Methods Study on Educational Equity Human Capital Development . Journal of Information Systems and Technology Research, 5(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.55537/jistr.v5i2.1486

Issue

Section

Articles