Development of an Interactive E-Module for Wired and Wireless Network Technology Learning at SMK Negeri 1 Sijunjung

Authors

  • Hasana Fiddaraini PGRI University
  • Heri Mulyono PGRI University
  • Bernediv Nurdin PGRI University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55537/jistr.v5i2.1544

Keywords:

Electronic module, Wireless network technology, ADDIE model, Validity, Practicality

Abstract

This study aimed to develop an interactive electronic module (e-module) for the Wired and Wireless Network Technology subject at SMK Negeri 1 Sijunjung and to evaluate its validity and practicality as a digital learning medium in vocational education. The research employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model, which consists of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. The participants involved media experts, subject-matter experts, teachers, and Grade XI students of the Computer and Network Engineering program. Data were collected through observations, interviews, validation questionnaires, practicality questionnaires, and student response questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive quantitative techniques.The developed e-module was created using Adobe Animate in HTML5 format and integrated multimedia components such as text, images, videos, audio, animations, and interactive exercises. The validation results showed that the e-module obtained a score of 84.03% from media experts and 93.30% from subject-matter experts, indicating that the module was categorized as very valid. The practicality test results showed scores of 93.75% from teachers and 88.52% from students, which were classified as very practical. In addition, student responses indicated that the e-module supported learning engagement, independent learning, and understanding of networking concepts more effectively. These findings indicate that the developed e-module is feasible and practical for use as a digital learning medium in vocational education and can support more flexible and interactive learning activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Dhawan, “Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0047239520934018.

[2] F. Martin, T. Sun, and C. D. Westine, “A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018,” Computers & Education, vol. 159, p. 104009, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009.

[3] R. E. Mayer, “Multimedia Learning,” Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 41, pp. 85–139, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6.

[4] J. Sweller, “Cognitive load theory and educational technology,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3.

[5] T. M. Duffy and D. J. Cunningham, “Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction,” in Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd ed., 2001, doi: 10.4324/9781410609519.

[6] G. Grow, “Teaching learners to be self-directed,” Adult Education Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 125–149, 1991, doi: 10.1177/0001848191041003001.

[7] M. Garrison, “Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model,” Adult Education Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 18–33, 1997, doi: 10.1177/074171369704800103.

[8] F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.

[9] Y. Lastri, “Pengembangan Dan Pemanfaatan Bahan Ajar E-Modul Dalam Proses Pembelajaran,” Jurnal Citra Pendidikan, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1139–1146, 2023, doi: 10.38048/jcp.v3i3.1914.

[10] A. Mutiara, A. Alfiriani, and R. Novita, “Pengembangan E-Modul Interaktif Pada Materi Analisis Data Mata Pelajaran Informatika Kelas X Di SMKN 1 Solok Selatan,” JATI (Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika), vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 10558–10565, 2024, doi: 10.36040/jati.v8i5.10976.

[11] R. M. Branch, Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6.

[12] A. G. Spatioti, I. Kazanidis, and J. Pange, “A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education,” Information, vol. 13, no. 9, p. 402, 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13090402.

[13] S. I. Shakeel et al., “Instructional design with ADDIE and rapid prototyping for blended learning,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 7601–7630, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11471-0.

[14] A. G. Spatioti, I. Kazanidis, and J. Pange, “A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education,” Information, vol. 13, no. 9, p. 402, 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13090402.

[15] E. Weyant, “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches,” Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 160–162, 2022, doi: 10.1080/1941126X.2022.2046231.

[16] A. N. Hess and K. Greer, “Designing for engagement: Using the ADDIE model to integrate high-impact practices into an online information literacy course,” Communications in Information Literacy, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 264–282, 2016, doi: 10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.27.

[17] T. Taufik, H. Efendi, and Ambiyar, “Development of Interactive Learning Media Using Adobe Animate,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2022, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v16i01.25523.

[18] I. Islahiyah, H. Pujiastuti, and A. Mutaqin, “Pengembangan E-Modul Dengan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa,” Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 2107, 2021, doi: 10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.3908.

[19] J. Boone and D. Boone, “Analyzing Likert Data,” Journal of Extension, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2012, doi: 10.34068/joe.50.02.48.

[20] A. Joshi, S. Kale, S. Chandel, and D. Pal, “Likert Scale: Explored and Explained,” British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 396–403, 2015, doi: 10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975.

[21] J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches,” 5th ed., SAGE Publications, 2018, doi: 10.5539/elt.v12n5p40.

[22] M. Carter, D. Bryant-Lukosius, A. DiCenso, J. Blythe, and A. J. Neville, “The use of triangulation in qualitative research,” Oncology Nursing Forum, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 545–547, 2014, doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.

[23] R. Moreno and R. Mayer, “Interactive multimodal learning environments,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 309–326, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2.

[24] R. C. Clark and R. E. Mayer, E-learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2016, doi: 10.1002/9781119239086.

[25] C. Rapanta, L. Botturi, P. Goodyear, L. Guàrdia, and M. Koole, “Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity,” Postdigital Science and Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 923–945, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y.

[26] J. Sweller, “Cognitive load theory and educational technology,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3.

[27] H. M. Huang, S. S. Liaw, and C. M. Lai, “Exploring learner acceptance of the use of virtual reality in medical education: A case study of desktop and projection-based display systems,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3–19, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2013.817436.

[28] F. Ke, “A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools,” in Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education, 2009, doi: 10.4018/978-1-59904-808-6.ch001.

[29] S. Hrastinski, “What do we mean by blended learning?,” TechTrends, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 564–569, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5.

[30] A. M. Nortvig, A. K. Petersen, and S. H. Balle, “A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement,” Electronic Journal of E-learning, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 46–55, 2018, doi: 10.34190/EJEL.16.1.003.

[31] M. Kebritchi, A. Lipschuetz, and L. Santiague, “Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 4–29, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0047239516661713.

[32] R. Moreno, “Does the medium matter? Determining the role of computer displays in learning,” Computers & Education, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 85–99, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00025-2.

[33] P. Ayres and J. Sweller, “The split-attention principle in multimedia learning,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Cambridge University Press, 2014, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005.

[34] F. Paas, A. Renkl, and J. Sweller, “Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2003, doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Fiddaraini, H., Mulyono , H., & Nurdin , B. (2026). Development of an Interactive E-Module for Wired and Wireless Network Technology Learning at SMK Negeri 1 Sijunjung. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Research, 5(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.55537/jistr.v5i2.1544

Issue

Section

Articles